Trosolwyg
Research summary
How do we make inferences in language? How do we imply? What makes figurative language, such as metaphors, different to literal language? How do we integrate linguistic and visual context with sentences? How is lying different to telling the truth? I study these sorts questions using psycholinguistic techniques such as eyetracking, speeded sentence judgments, and production tasks.
My focus is on psycholinguistics and linguistic pragmatics but I also apply this knowledge to real world problems. One example is how to reduce exageration of science in the media. We investigate where exageration comes from (Journalists? Scientists? Press Officers?) and what techiques could be helpful to reduce it, such as caveats ("One limitation of this study is that...") or qualifying expressions such as "may" or "might" in headlines ("Vitamin D may help reduce cancer"). Another example is the use of language in public heatlth campaigns. We test different linguistic methods of encouraging heathy behaviour, such as "myth-busting" campaigns about flu vaccines, with the aim of improving health communication.
Cyhoeddiad
2024
- Griffiths, M., Boivin, J., Powell, E. and Bott, L. 2024. Evaluating source credibility effects in health labelling using vending machines in a hospital setting. PLoS ONE 19(2), article number: e0296901. (10.1371/journal.pone.0296901)
2023
- Rees, A., Carter, E. and Bott, L. 2023. Priming Scalar and ad hoc enrichment in children. Cognition 239, article number: 105572. (10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105572)
- Challenger, A., Sumner, P., Powell, E. and Bott, L. 2023. Identifying reasons for non-acceptance of influenza vaccine in healthcare workers: An observational study using declination form data. BMC Health Services Research 23, article number: 1167. (10.1186/s12913-023-10141-2)
- Cabiddu, F., Bott, L., Jones, G. and Gambi, C. 2023. CLASSIC utterance boundary: a chunking-based model of early naturalistic word segmentation. Language Learning 73(3), pp. 942-975. (10.1111/lang.12559)
2022
- Cabiddu, F., Bott, L., Jones, G. and Gambi, C. 2022. ChiSense-12: An English sense-annotated child-directed speech corpus. Presented at: 13th ELRA Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2022), Marseille, France, 20-25 June 2022 Presented at Calzolari, N. et al. eds.Proceedings of the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. European Language Resrouces Association pp. 5198-5205.
- Bott, L. and Frisson, S. 2022. Salient alternatives facilitate implicatures. PLoS ONE 17(3), article number: e0265781. (10.1371/journal.pone.0265781)
- Challenger, A., Sumner, P. and Bott, L. 2022. COVID-19 myth-busting: an experimental study. BMC Public Health 22, article number: 131. (10.1186/s12889-021-12464-3)
2021
- Bambini, V., Bott, L. and Schumacher, P. B. 2021. It is not always a matter of time: Addressing the costs of metaphor and metonymy through a speed-accuracy trade-off study. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 75(2), pp. 189-196. (10.1037/cep0000256)
2020
- Griffiths, M. L., Powell, E., Usher, L., Boivin, J. and Bott, L. 2020. The health benefits and cost-effectiveness of complete healthy vending. PLoS ONE 15(9), article number: e0239483. (10.1371/journal.pone.0239483)
- Rees, A. and Bott, L. 2020. Overlapping mechanisms in implying and inferring. Cognitive Science 44(1), article number: e12808. (10.1111/cogs.12808)
- Bratton, L., Adams, R. C., Challenger, A., Boivin, J., Bott, L., Chambers, C. D. and Sumner, P. 2020. Causal claims about correlations reduced in press releases following academic study of health news. Wellcome Open Research 5, article number: 6. (10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15647.1)
2019
- Bott, L. et al. 2019. Caveats in science-based news stories communicate caution without lowering interest. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 25(4), pp. 517-542. (10.1037/xap0000232)
- Bratton, L., Adams, R. C., Challenger, A., Boivin, J., Bott, L., Chambers, C. D. and Sumner, P. 2019. The association between exaggeration in health-related science news and academic press releases: a replication study. Wellcome Open Research 4, article number: 148. (10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15486.2)
- Rees, A., Bott, L. and Schumacher, P. B. 2019. Event-related potentials in pragmatic priming. Neuroscience Letters 712, article number: 134435. (10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134435)
- Adams, R. C. et al. 2019. Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial. BMC Medicine 17, article number: 91. (10.1186/s12916-019-1324-7)
2018
- Bott, L. and Williams, E. 2018. Psycholinguistic approaches to lying and deception. In: Meibauer, J. ed. The Oxford Handbook of Lying. Oxford Handbooks Online Oxford University Press, pp. 70., (10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.5)
- Rees, A. and Bott, L. 2018. The role of alternative salience in the derivation of scalar implicatures. Cognition 176, pp. 1-14. (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.024)
2017
- Tomlinson, J., Gotzner, N. and Bott, L. 2017. Intonation and pragmatic enrichment: how intonation constrains ad-hoc scalar inferences. Language and Speech 60(2), pp. 200-223. (10.1177/0023830917716101)
- Adams, R. C. et al. 2017. How readers understand causal and correlational expressions used in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 23(1), pp. 1-14. (10.1037/xap0000100)
2016
- Bott, L. and Chemla, E. 2016. Shared and distinct mechanisms in deriving linguistic enrichment. Journal of Memory and Language 91, pp. 117-140. (10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.004)
- Bott, L., Rees, A. and Frisson, S. 2016. The time course of familiar metonymy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42(7), pp. 1160-1170. (10.1037/xlm0000218)
- Sumner, P. et al. 2016. Exaggerations and caveats in press releases and health-related science news. PloS One 11(12), article number: e0168217. (10.1371/journal.pone.0168217)
2015
- Chemla, E. and Bott, L. 2015. Using structural priming to study scopal representations and operations. Linguistic Inquiry 46(1), pp. 157-172. (10.1162/LING_a_00178)
2014
- Chemla, E. and Bott, L. 2014. Processing inferences at the semantics/pragmatics frontier: Disjunctions and free choice. Cognition 130(3), pp. 380-396. (10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.013)
- Chen, L., Mo, L. and Bott, L. 2014. How people learn features in the absence of classification error. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26(8), pp. 893-905. (10.1080/20445911.2014.965712)
2013
- Tomlinson, J. M., Bailey, T. M. and Bott, L. 2013. Possibly all of that and then some: scalar implicatures are understood in two steps. Journal of Memory and Language 89(1), pp. 18-35. (10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.003)
- Chemla, E. and Bott, L. 2013. Processing presuppositions: dynamic semantics vs pragmatic enrichment. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(3), pp. 241-260. (10.1080/01690965.2011.615221)
- Williams, E. J., Bott, L., Patrick, J. and Lewis, M. B. 2013. Telling lies: the irrepressible truth?. Plos One 8(4), article number: e60713. (10.1371/journal.pone.0060713)
2012
- Bott, L., Bailey, T. M. and Grodner, D. 2012. Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language 66(1), pp. 123-142. (10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.005)
- Patrick, J., Bott, L., Morgan, P. and King, S. L. 2012. Out of sequence communications can affect causal judgement. Thinking & Reasoning 18(2), pp. 133-158. (10.1080/13546783.2012.658240)
2009
- Bott, L. 2009. Changes in activation levels with scalar implicatures. In: Sauerland, U. and Yatsushiro, K. eds. Semantics and Pragmatics: From Experiment to Theory. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 16-29.
- Noveck, I., Chevallier, C., Chevaux, F., Musolino, J. and Bott, L. 2009. Children's enrichments of conjunctive sentences in context. In: De Brabanter, P. and Kissine, M. eds. Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. Current Research in the Semantics/pragmatics Interface Vol. 20. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 211-234.
- Bott, L., Frisson, S. and Murphy, G. L. 2009. Interpreting conjunctions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(4), pp. 681-706. (10.1080/17470210802214866)
2008
- Szabolcsi, A., Bott, L. and McElree, B. 2008. The effect of negative polarity items on inference verification. Journal of Semantics 25(4), pp. 411-450. (10.1093/jos/ffn008)
- Chevallier, C., Noveck, I. A., Nazir, T., Bott, L., Lanzetti, V. and Sperber, D. 2008. Making disjunctions exclusive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(11), pp. 1741-1760. (10.1080/17470210701712960)
2007
- Bott, L., Hoffman, A. and Murphy, G. L. 2007. Blocking in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 136(4), pp. 685-699. (10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.685)
- Bott, L. and Murphy, G. L. 2007. Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning. Memory and Cognition 35(3), pp. 432-443.
2006
- Bott, L., Brock, J., Brockdorff, N., Boucher, J. and Lamberts, K. 2006. Perceptual similarity in autism. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59(7), pp. 1237-1254. (10.1080/02724980543000196)
2005
- Kilner, J., Bott, L. and Posada, A. 2005. Modulations in the degree of synchronization during ongoing oscillatory activity in the human brain. European Journal of Neuroscience 21(9), pp. 2547-2554. (10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04069.x)
2004
- Bott, L. and Noveck, I. 2004. Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3), pp. 437-457. (10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.006)
- Bott, L. and Heit, E. 2004. Nonmonotonic extrapolation in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 30(1), pp. 38-50. (10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.38)
- Heit, E., Briggs, J. and Bott, L. 2004. Modeling the effects of prior knowledge on learning incongruent features of category members. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory and Cognition 30(5), pp. 1065-1081. (10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1065)
2000
- Heit, E. and Bott, L. 2000. Knowledge selection in category learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 39, pp. 163-169.
Articles
- Griffiths, M., Boivin, J., Powell, E. and Bott, L. 2024. Evaluating source credibility effects in health labelling using vending machines in a hospital setting. PLoS ONE 19(2), article number: e0296901. (10.1371/journal.pone.0296901)
- Rees, A., Carter, E. and Bott, L. 2023. Priming Scalar and ad hoc enrichment in children. Cognition 239, article number: 105572. (10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105572)
- Challenger, A., Sumner, P., Powell, E. and Bott, L. 2023. Identifying reasons for non-acceptance of influenza vaccine in healthcare workers: An observational study using declination form data. BMC Health Services Research 23, article number: 1167. (10.1186/s12913-023-10141-2)
- Cabiddu, F., Bott, L., Jones, G. and Gambi, C. 2023. CLASSIC utterance boundary: a chunking-based model of early naturalistic word segmentation. Language Learning 73(3), pp. 942-975. (10.1111/lang.12559)
- Bott, L. and Frisson, S. 2022. Salient alternatives facilitate implicatures. PLoS ONE 17(3), article number: e0265781. (10.1371/journal.pone.0265781)
- Challenger, A., Sumner, P. and Bott, L. 2022. COVID-19 myth-busting: an experimental study. BMC Public Health 22, article number: 131. (10.1186/s12889-021-12464-3)
- Bambini, V., Bott, L. and Schumacher, P. B. 2021. It is not always a matter of time: Addressing the costs of metaphor and metonymy through a speed-accuracy trade-off study. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 75(2), pp. 189-196. (10.1037/cep0000256)
- Griffiths, M. L., Powell, E., Usher, L., Boivin, J. and Bott, L. 2020. The health benefits and cost-effectiveness of complete healthy vending. PLoS ONE 15(9), article number: e0239483. (10.1371/journal.pone.0239483)
- Rees, A. and Bott, L. 2020. Overlapping mechanisms in implying and inferring. Cognitive Science 44(1), article number: e12808. (10.1111/cogs.12808)
- Bratton, L., Adams, R. C., Challenger, A., Boivin, J., Bott, L., Chambers, C. D. and Sumner, P. 2020. Causal claims about correlations reduced in press releases following academic study of health news. Wellcome Open Research 5, article number: 6. (10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15647.1)
- Bott, L. et al. 2019. Caveats in science-based news stories communicate caution without lowering interest. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 25(4), pp. 517-542. (10.1037/xap0000232)
- Bratton, L., Adams, R. C., Challenger, A., Boivin, J., Bott, L., Chambers, C. D. and Sumner, P. 2019. The association between exaggeration in health-related science news and academic press releases: a replication study. Wellcome Open Research 4, article number: 148. (10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15486.2)
- Rees, A., Bott, L. and Schumacher, P. B. 2019. Event-related potentials in pragmatic priming. Neuroscience Letters 712, article number: 134435. (10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134435)
- Adams, R. C. et al. 2019. Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial. BMC Medicine 17, article number: 91. (10.1186/s12916-019-1324-7)
- Rees, A. and Bott, L. 2018. The role of alternative salience in the derivation of scalar implicatures. Cognition 176, pp. 1-14. (10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.024)
- Tomlinson, J., Gotzner, N. and Bott, L. 2017. Intonation and pragmatic enrichment: how intonation constrains ad-hoc scalar inferences. Language and Speech 60(2), pp. 200-223. (10.1177/0023830917716101)
- Adams, R. C. et al. 2017. How readers understand causal and correlational expressions used in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 23(1), pp. 1-14. (10.1037/xap0000100)
- Bott, L. and Chemla, E. 2016. Shared and distinct mechanisms in deriving linguistic enrichment. Journal of Memory and Language 91, pp. 117-140. (10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.004)
- Bott, L., Rees, A. and Frisson, S. 2016. The time course of familiar metonymy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42(7), pp. 1160-1170. (10.1037/xlm0000218)
- Sumner, P. et al. 2016. Exaggerations and caveats in press releases and health-related science news. PloS One 11(12), article number: e0168217. (10.1371/journal.pone.0168217)
- Chemla, E. and Bott, L. 2015. Using structural priming to study scopal representations and operations. Linguistic Inquiry 46(1), pp. 157-172. (10.1162/LING_a_00178)
- Chemla, E. and Bott, L. 2014. Processing inferences at the semantics/pragmatics frontier: Disjunctions and free choice. Cognition 130(3), pp. 380-396. (10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.013)
- Chen, L., Mo, L. and Bott, L. 2014. How people learn features in the absence of classification error. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26(8), pp. 893-905. (10.1080/20445911.2014.965712)
- Tomlinson, J. M., Bailey, T. M. and Bott, L. 2013. Possibly all of that and then some: scalar implicatures are understood in two steps. Journal of Memory and Language 89(1), pp. 18-35. (10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.003)
- Chemla, E. and Bott, L. 2013. Processing presuppositions: dynamic semantics vs pragmatic enrichment. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(3), pp. 241-260. (10.1080/01690965.2011.615221)
- Williams, E. J., Bott, L., Patrick, J. and Lewis, M. B. 2013. Telling lies: the irrepressible truth?. Plos One 8(4), article number: e60713. (10.1371/journal.pone.0060713)
- Bott, L., Bailey, T. M. and Grodner, D. 2012. Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language 66(1), pp. 123-142. (10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.005)
- Patrick, J., Bott, L., Morgan, P. and King, S. L. 2012. Out of sequence communications can affect causal judgement. Thinking & Reasoning 18(2), pp. 133-158. (10.1080/13546783.2012.658240)
- Bott, L., Frisson, S. and Murphy, G. L. 2009. Interpreting conjunctions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62(4), pp. 681-706. (10.1080/17470210802214866)
- Szabolcsi, A., Bott, L. and McElree, B. 2008. The effect of negative polarity items on inference verification. Journal of Semantics 25(4), pp. 411-450. (10.1093/jos/ffn008)
- Chevallier, C., Noveck, I. A., Nazir, T., Bott, L., Lanzetti, V. and Sperber, D. 2008. Making disjunctions exclusive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(11), pp. 1741-1760. (10.1080/17470210701712960)
- Bott, L., Hoffman, A. and Murphy, G. L. 2007. Blocking in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 136(4), pp. 685-699. (10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.685)
- Bott, L. and Murphy, G. L. 2007. Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning. Memory and Cognition 35(3), pp. 432-443.
- Bott, L., Brock, J., Brockdorff, N., Boucher, J. and Lamberts, K. 2006. Perceptual similarity in autism. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59(7), pp. 1237-1254. (10.1080/02724980543000196)
- Kilner, J., Bott, L. and Posada, A. 2005. Modulations in the degree of synchronization during ongoing oscillatory activity in the human brain. European Journal of Neuroscience 21(9), pp. 2547-2554. (10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04069.x)
- Bott, L. and Noveck, I. 2004. Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3), pp. 437-457. (10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.006)
- Bott, L. and Heit, E. 2004. Nonmonotonic extrapolation in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 30(1), pp. 38-50. (10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.38)
- Heit, E., Briggs, J. and Bott, L. 2004. Modeling the effects of prior knowledge on learning incongruent features of category members. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory and Cognition 30(5), pp. 1065-1081. (10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1065)
- Heit, E. and Bott, L. 2000. Knowledge selection in category learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 39, pp. 163-169.
Book sections
- Bott, L. and Williams, E. 2018. Psycholinguistic approaches to lying and deception. In: Meibauer, J. ed. The Oxford Handbook of Lying. Oxford Handbooks Online Oxford University Press, pp. 70., (10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.5)
- Bott, L. 2009. Changes in activation levels with scalar implicatures. In: Sauerland, U. and Yatsushiro, K. eds. Semantics and Pragmatics: From Experiment to Theory. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 16-29.
- Noveck, I., Chevallier, C., Chevaux, F., Musolino, J. and Bott, L. 2009. Children's enrichments of conjunctive sentences in context. In: De Brabanter, P. and Kissine, M. eds. Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models. Current Research in the Semantics/pragmatics Interface Vol. 20. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 211-234.
Conferences
- Cabiddu, F., Bott, L., Jones, G. and Gambi, C. 2022. ChiSense-12: An English sense-annotated child-directed speech corpus. Presented at: 13th ELRA Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2022), Marseille, France, 20-25 June 2022 Presented at Calzolari, N. et al. eds.Proceedings of the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. European Language Resrouces Association pp. 5198-5205.
Ymchwil
Research topics and related papers
I study how we understand and process language. My focus is on linguistic pragmatics and psycholonguistics, in particular implications. Implications are components of meaning that are not present in the literal interpretation of a sentence. Our mind enriches the basic meaning of a sentence by using the context and some basic assumptions about how conversations work. For example, consider the following exchange:
Rachel: Have you met Helen's new boyfriend, John? He rich and intellgent.
Catherine: Well, he's rich...
Here, Catherine communicates that John is not intelligent. But there is nothing in her words that says this. We assume that if Catherine had agreed with Rachel she would have said so, and that because she didn't, she must disagree.
Consider another example:
"John broke all his arms"
This sentence is strange. There is nothing wrong with it in a literal sense, but it implies that John had more than two arms to break, which, unless he was an octopuss, would be unusual. The implication is so strong it arises even when it is inconsistent with the real world.
My work involves investigating how the mind computes implications like those above. I use standard psycholinguistic takes techniques such as eyetracking, speeded sentence judgements and production tasks. The goal is to develop a processing model that integrates how we understand and produce literal language with how we infer and imply.
I have worked on a variety of different areas in pragmatics including scalar implicatures (Bott & Noveck, 2004; Bott, Bailey, & Grodner, 2010; Bott & Chemla, 2016; Rees & Bott, 20), presuppositions (Chemla & Bott, 2014) and lying (Williams et al., 2014). Ongoing projects investigate the psycholingistics of how implications are produced, as opposed to understood.
I also work in several applied areas relating to language and cognition. I have several projects reducing exageration in the media (Sumner et al., 2016; Adams et al., 2016), and public health aspects of communication, such as flu vaccination campaigns.
Bywgraffiad
Undergraduate education
1992 – 1995. BSc (J. Hons). Mathematics and Psychology, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Postgraduate education
1998 – 2001. PhD, Psychology University of Warwick
Supervised by Dr. E. Heit and Prof. G.D.Brown
Thesis title: Prior Knowledge and Statistical Models of Categorization
1995 – 1996. MSc. Cognitive Science, University of Birmingham
Thesis title: The Effects of Race and Typicality on an Exemplar-Based Connectionist Model of Face Processing
Employment
October 2011: promoted to Senior Lecturer, Cardiff University, UK. 2005 – 2011: Lecturer, Cardiff University, UK. June 2003 – June 2005: Postdoctoral Researcher, New York University, with Professor Gregory Murphy. Experimental pragmatics and category learning. April 2001 - April 2003. Postdoctoral Researcher, Institut des Sciences Cognitive, Lyon, France, with Dr. Ira Noveck. Experimental pragmatics. Oct 1996 - Jan 1998: Research Associate at the Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, with Dr. Evan Heit. Jan 1998 - April 2001: Statistics tutor. University of Warwick, UK. Summers 1998 and 1999: Open University Summer School tutor. Artificial Intelligence module.
Meysydd goruchwyliaeth
Postgraduate research interests
I am interested in supervising work on language processing. My research is focussed on pragmatics, figurative language, and linguistic communication. I am particularly interested in supervising students who may have completed a linguistics or a philosophy of language degree and who wish to branch out into psycholinguistics. Currently I am looking for somebody to work on the following projects:
How does the language system integrate visual and auditory information?
How does short term memory interact with linguistic pragmatics?
Why is lying so easy?
How are presuppositions and implicatures processed and represented?
Can connectionist models simulate pragmatic maxims?
If you are interested in applying for a PhD, in any of these areas, or for further information regarding my postgraduate research, please contact me directly (contact details available on the 'Overview' page), or submit a formal application.